Glade

Internal · Data Quality

Signals & Activity Coverage

Every location activity on Glade is backed by one or more signals — species records, priority habitat classifications, or derived facility data. This page shows the distribution, quality, and coverage of those signals across the dataset.

Total signals

2,364,677

across all sources and activities

Locations covered

400,174

unique locations with ≥1 signal

Avg confidence

76.0%

mean across all signal rows

High confidence

65%

signals scoring ≥0.75

Signals by source

Each source contributes a different type of evidence. NBN species records tend to be the most granular; PHI habitat signals the most reliable at high confidence.

Priority Habitats
985,656 signalsavg 75%

Natural England Priority Habitat Inventory — deciduous woodland, reedbeds, heathland and more. · 317,188 locations

NBN Atlas
704,283 signalsavg 82%

Species records from the National Biodiversity Network — birds, mammals, insects, plants, fungi. · 180,749 locations

Derived
600,243 signalsavg 70%

Signals computed from location type, facilities, and trail data (e.g. playgrounds, cycling). · 183,250 locations

NBN Foraging
74,495 signalsavg 74%

Foraging-relevant plant and fungi species extracted from NBN Atlas using curated species lists. · 74,495 locations

Signal types & seasons

Signal type tells us what kind of evidence backs the activity. Season distribution shows how well the dataset captures time-of-year variation.

By type

habitat
985,656
species
778,778
location_type
252,262
default_rule
120,979
designation
92,332
osm_route
90,006
facility
43,662
trail
726
ncn_route
276

Peak seasons

year-round
905,606
summer
872,031
spring
801,999
autumn
669,873
winter
254,851

Year-round signals have no seasonal restriction. Season-tagged signals are shown only when the season matches (e.g. autumn fungi).

Confidence score distribution

Confidence runs from 0 (no evidence) to 1.0 (certainty). Most signals should cluster between 0.65–0.85 — enough evidence to show the activity, not so high as to be overclaiming. Currently 65% of signals score ≥0.75. A heavy left tail (below 0.60) would suggest weak base signals that may cause noise; a spike near the cap (0.90+) is normal for high-quality PHI habitat signals.

164,814329,628494,441659,2550.450.500.550.600.650.700.750.800.850.900.95

< 0.65

Weak

May produce low-relevance results

0.65 – 0.80

Good

Core working range for most activities

> 0.80

Strong

High-quality habitat or dense species records

Activity coverage

Coverage tells us which activities have the broadest signal support. Thin coverage (few locations) or low average confidence signals an activity that may show inconsistently in search results.

ActivityLocationsSignalsAvg conf · distribution
Wildlife
398,554605,123
80%
Bird watching
391,651490,717
82%
Foraging
336,333375,494
71%
Insect spotting
205,579224,922
78%
Seasonal nature
145,463145,463
71%
Dog walks
120,979120,979
78%
Heritage
89,08389,083
69%
Forest walks
81,94481,944
63%
Hiking
44,05044,146
64%
Cycling
39,97440,020
67%
Family friendly
35,79636,003
68%
Picnic day out
34,30334,676
62%
Playgrounds
32,16232,162
84%
Mushroom foraging
21,15921,159
78%
Waterside walks
9,79510,146
72%
Mountain biking
6,5056,554
63%
Farm visits
3,4973,585
80%
Horse riding
2,1862,188
75%
Easy access
228228
67%
Trail running
8585
71%

Static data snapshot - May 2026